Thursday, August 9, 2012

Stigmatizing Teen Mothers is Dangerous

Here are some telling excerpts on teen pregnancy that I ran across today:

From a 1985 study of teenaged mothers in the 1970s (still widely cited on the internet) by Carolyn Makinson called The health consequences of teenage fertility: "Research indicates that pregnant teens are less likely to receive prenatal care, often seeking it in the third trimester, if at all."

Similarly, The Guttmacher Institute reports that "One-third of pregnant teens receive insufficient prenatal care and that their children are more likely to suffer from health issues in childhood or be hospitalized than those born to older women."

Neither of these statements is untrue, and neither should be very unfamiliar to Americans who attended public school in the past two decades--or who have been on sites such as Stayteen.org, or watched MTV's 16 and Pregnant. Both statements should make you pause, and think twice.
But the excerpt that I found the most telling, the most eloquent summation of why shaming young mothers is bad practice, and medically unwise comes from a much more recent (2006) study:

"Young mothers who are given high-quality maternity care have significantly healthier babies than those that do not. Many of the health-issues associated with teenage mothers, many of whom do not have health insurance, appear to result from lack of access to high-quality medical care,”

44 simple words.

For decades, the approach towards teen pregnancy in America has been that is undesirable, across the board, no exceptions. That it is dangerous for the mother and the child—low birth weight, prematurity, anemia, lower IQs, higher rates of abuse and neglect. That there are no good teen mothers, or teen fathers.
It’s an interesting observation.
And it’s pinned on the wrong cause.
I’d argue, along with a growing number of other people, that teen pregnancy is a symptom along with those other indicators, rather than a cause of them. The root of the issue is found in socioeconomic factors, in racial indicators, in immigrant status, in educational attainment level. If you compare older mothers with similar characteristics—lower levels of education, low socioeconomic status, immigrants to this country whose English is limited, you find a similar trend: babies and mothers aren’t as healthy. Women who’s access to medical care is limited—whether it is because they cannot afford insurance, do not know where to go for care, cannot speak the language to explain themselves, or simply live in an area where care is not adequately provided (in rural areas, or greatly taxed inner-city systems)—suffer.
Teen mothers, and young mothers, often face many of these same obstacles, with the added pressure of insensitive, heavy-handed campaigns.
The daily news site Colorlines, says this about these campaigns:
“A controversial ad series that the National Campaign ran in 2001 is an apt example. The group published print advertisements with photos of young people with one word across their chests. The most shocking of the series were the two with young women of color, one with the word “DIRTY” and the other with the word “CHEAP.” The words were part of sentences that ran along the spine of the ad in smaller words, which upon closer inspection focused on changing dirty diapers and the cost of condoms, respectively. But the main message was clear: being teen parents meant something about who these girls were, something decidedly negative.”
This series of ads, like so many others, presents young mothers, and to a much lesser extent, young fathers, as being inherently the problem. Being a young mother myself—becoming pregnant at 20, as a junior in college—I can personally attest how much this can get under the skin of young parents, increasing their unwillingness to seek help, medical or otherwise, when they know it will result in harsh judgment, stares, and stinging remarks—even from trusted advisors, doctors, and friends. I hid my pregnancy for as long as I was able, and while I sought out medical care, and took care of myself and my baby, I can understand why other women in a similar situation would not—or could not. Shunning by family, friends, and communities, losing the roof over their heads, having doctors treat them as insignificant—all these are very real possibilities a young parent faces.
And this puts them at risk.  It puts their children at risk.
A good number of the dolls in the I, MOM exhibit represent young women who died in 2012.


That said, organizations like Albuquerque’s Young Women United and the campaign they spear-headed, Youn Parents Day, are a sign of the changing tide. And, might I say, more power to them and the women and families they educate, and the lives they can improve, and save.


If you're a young parent, or your life has been touched by one in a positive way, please join the campaign. Take a photo of yourself holding a sign that proclaims "Young Parents Deserve Recognition," and tag Young Women United to it on Facebook in solidarity for Young Parents Day on August 25, 2012!

Sunday, July 29, 2012

This Labor Day, Let's Labor For Change




Thank you, Mothering.com  for the heads up about this fantastic event (don't you just love Facebook updates from them? I know I do!)


From the Mothering.com website, a call for action!

"We need women, men and children to come stand in support of evidence based maternity care for everyone on September 3, 2012. The Rally will be held in locations all over the country--find your state/city here!!"



The National Rally for Change is to encourage and insist that all maternal healthcare providers practice evidence based care--so what exactly does that mean? It means, simply, that we expect our doctors, our obstetricians, our midwives and all other medical personal to apply the best available evidence gained from the scientific method to clinical decision making, assessing the strength of the evidence of risks and benefits of treatments (including lack of treatment) and diagnostic tests. This helps clinicians understand whether or not a treatment will do more good than harm. Sounds like a logical desire on our part, right? The problem is, on average it takes 20 years for proven research to become practice.
For the sake of mothers and babies everywhere, we can’t wait 20 years.

This matters for all people. Maternal health care affects not only mothers, and their unborn children, but their already-born children, their partners, their whole families. It affects our communities, by killing women before their time, by maiming others. It affects our whole national psyche.

"A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Ghandi

I will be the last to say that women are the weakest members of society. We are strong. We expect humane treatment, for ourselves and for our families. We know how to right a wrong. But too many women’s voices are being lost.

Too many women are being pressured, bullied, uninformed, and paying too, too great a price.

This is not a protest, but a public outreach.




I will be standing for the rights of women, with my daughter, in Phoenix on September 3rd 2012.

Where will you be?

Monday, May 21, 2012

Save the Children: The State of the World's Mothers

Save the Children's 2012 report, The State of the World's Mothers, was released this month, and the U.S.A. has moved up a few spots, landing at 25 out of 165 countries!

The move, however, was  attributed to "improvements across education indicators," and not improvements specifically regarding maternal and child health and well-being. Every little bit counts!

The slightly more fightening statistic, though, was lifetime risk of maternal death--the chances that a girl of 15 will, at some time in her life, die of childbirth related causes in the United States. From the report:

"In the United States, mothers face a 1 in 2,100 risk of maternal death – the highest of any industrialized nation."


Allow me to break that down for you, using the National Security Council's lovely infographic, the Odds of Dying:

In the United States, you are 3 times more likely to die from a baby, than from a gun (Fire arms discharge, lifetime risk-- 1 in 6,609), and 3.5 times more likely to die from a baby than from plane crashes (Air and Space transport incidents, lifetime risk--1 in 7,178). You are 69 times more likely to die from a baby, than from a dog attack (Bitten/struck by dog, lifetime risk--1 in 144,899).


Here's an easy way to help spread the word about the sorry state of the United States' maternal healthcare system:

Ask your friends the next time you see them. How many of them are scared of guns? How about flying on an airplane--this particular fear ranks 9th according to About.com's list of phobias and fears (dogs ranked 5th).



Then put their fears in perspective.

Sunday, May 13, 2012

In Memory of: Alice Hansen

One of the blogs I (Anna) follow in my private life is a brilliant crafting blog from my hometown, called HoneyBear Lane. Run by Heidi, a momma to 3 little ones, it has crfats and sewing projects, home decor, a little bit of cooking, and a ton of funny, inspirational stories.
However, recently the HoneyBear Lane family has been hit, hard. Heidi's sister-in-law, Alice, contracted a horrible infection known as Strep A Toxic Shock after giving birth to her third child, lapsed into a coma, and after a hard fight, unfortunetly passed away. The story, in full, you can read here.

Everyone involved in the I, MOM project (and all of HoneyBear Lane's readers) are saddened and shocked by the tragic news.

Heidi has set up a Paypal account to accept donations for her brother and their three small children. Please send them your condolences, and offer up your prayers, if you're so inclined!

A special doll is being made in Alice's memory.

Alice was a talented musician, and her sister-in-law asked
that these posters be shared in Alice's name.

Friday, May 11, 2012

NONA closes


So, as NONA winds down this weekend with the graduating 2012 class at Santa Fe University of Art and Design recieving their diplomas Saturday morning, here's a quick visual recap!


5 of NONA's 9 artists-- left to raight:
Daisy Quezada, Anna Ryan, Karen Belton, Michelle Eckert, Jared Schmock,
and faculty advisor, Susan York.


Wall text for I, MOM

"In Memory of Mothers
In 2011, 24 out of every 100,000 children born in the United States lost their
mothers in childbirth. The Center for Disease Control lists 2/3 of those maternal
deaths as "entirely preventable," a result of inadequate care, oversight, and
negligence. The 640 lives unnecessarily lost prompted Amnesty International to
label the maternal death rate in the U.S. a crisis.

The 640 dolls gathered here represent the 640 women who needlessly died
giving birth last year."


Ground view of all 640 dolls and wall text.


Detail of the white/pink section of dolls.


Red section detail.


Red and black dolls detail.



Daisy Quezada, Anna and Madilynn Ryan (that's us!) and Anna Harney in front of the 640 dolls.



NONA's opening night and subsequent 2 week run went great--Santa Fe's community turned out in droves and reception to the work of the individual artists was warm. Thank you to everyone who made it to the show--and who made the show possible!

Saturday, May 5, 2012

So I was curious. . .

I know that health statistics lag a few years, depending on the latest reports. In the I, MOM project, and installation, I've been using the statistics for 2011--a personal year for me, not only because last year is the year Amnesty International released their updated data for Deadly Delivery, but also because that's the year my daughter was born.
Today I was wondering, however, what I could do with the US census birth rates per state from the latest year available and the maternal mortality rates from Deadly Delivery (the data for which, I believe, is also from 2009 numbers).
Why, figure out how many women died giving birth in each state in 2009, of course!

So this is what I'll be doing tonight--converting ratios to percentages, multiplying percentages by number of births, and coming up with the number of women who died, by state.
I haven't been able to find the statistics for this online as of yet, so I expect the results to be interesting. I'll post again when I have the hard numbers for all 50 states figured out!

Friday, May 4, 2012

More shocking statistics

Baby Center is causing a stir again this week, citing a Fox news article about premature births:

"According to Fox News, 15-million babies worldwide were born prematurely in 2010. 1.1 million of those babies died. A Reuters report explains that premature birth rates have doubled in developing countries since 1995, despite widespread efforts to reduce them.

The difference between death from premature birth and survival lies in where these babies are born.
“While more than 90 percent of babies born before 28 weeks in wealthier countries survive, however, in poor countries more than 90 percent die.”
Of the eleven countries that have preterm birth rates of 15 % or higher, nine of those are in sub-Saharan Africa. But, while geography is at play, wealth alone does not determine preterm birth rates.
The U.S. ranks poorly, coming in at 130th out of 184 countries. With a 12 percent rate– 12 preterm births per 100– USA ties with Somalia, Turkey and Thailand. It only just edges out Honduras and Timor."

Reading most of the comments, the consensus seems to be that the United States has a high rate of premature births because of our advanced healthcare system--better healthcare, the comments read, leads to more live preemies! While I'm ready to acknowledge that--again, they state that “While more than 90 percent of babies born before 28 weeks in wealthier countries survive, however, in poor countries more than 90 percent die.” Obviously, wealth and technology are saving babies.
However, that doesn't change the fact that here, 12 out of every 100 babies BORN, regardless of whether they live or die, are born premature.

That doesn't change the fact that here, with 12 out of 100 babies being born premature, we are on par with Somalia, a country famed as "a failed state and is one of the poorest and most violent states in the world," according to the Human Development Report 2010 – Data Tables. United Nations.

It may be speculative, but perhaps some of the same problems that contribute to the poor state of our preterm birth rate are also contributing to the dangerous state of maternal health in America. 

Healthy  moms = healthy babies.

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Too much and too little


The Amnesty International report Deadly Delivery, released last year, comes on the heels of an investigation in California that found that maternal deaths have tripled there in recent years. It also, not surprisingly, follows a maternal-mortality alert issued in January by the Joint Commission, a group that accredits hospitals and other medical organizations. That report noted that some of the most common errors included failure to control blood pressure in hypertensive women and failure to pay attention to vital signs after C-sections (which occur at a rate of over 32%); both highly preventable risk factors.

While all reports also point out the numerous barriers women face in accessing care, even among those who are insured or qualify for Medicaid, no one can argue that poverty is a major factor, but with the U.S. spending more money per women per pregnancy than any other nation, it's apparent that throwing money at the problem will not make it disappear. All women in the U.S. are put at a unique risk from the overuse of obstetrical intervention and barriers to access to more woman-centered, physiologic care provided by family-practice physicians and midwives, compounded with the lack of medical oversight of this intervention.

We are doing both too much, and too little.

Sunday, April 22, 2012

NONA is around the corner!

NONA, the BFA thesis show for seniors at the Santa Fe University of Art and Design, opens in a little less than a week, on April 27, 2012.  Come see the installation of In Memory of Mothers from 5PM to 7 PM, as well as photography, painting, video art, and other installations.

Check out David Grey's fantastic invitations.

Sunday, April 15, 2012

Healthy People 2010--did it happen?

In 1998, US federal agencies developed national health objectives – the Healthy People 2010 goals. These set a target of reducing maternal deaths to 4.3 per 100,000 live births by 2010.


Five states in America have currently met those goals. Hats off to Indiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, and Vermont!


However, in some areas ratios are significantly--staggeringly--higher: in Georgia it is 20.5; in Washington, DC, it is 34.9.

In New York City, the ratio for black women is 83.6 per 100,000 live births.

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Morbidity and Mortality

Deadly Delivery found that little data is
available on maternal morbidity (complications),
despite its frequency. “Near misses,” complications so severe the
woman nearly dies, have increased by over
25% between 1998 and 2005.

Currently, nearly 30% of women experience
complications related to childbirth,
and this has not improved in recent years.

-Deadly Delivery, page 6

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

The Cost of Healthcare in America

The total amount spent on health care in the USA is greater than in any other country in the world.

Hospitalization related to pregnancy and childbirth costs some US$86 billion a year; the highest hospitalization costs of any area of medicine
 Women in the USA have a greater lifetime risk of dying of pregnancy-related
complications than women in 50 other countries.
The likelihood of a woman dying in childbirth in the USA is:
Five times greater than in Greece.
Four times greater than in Germany.
Three times greater than in Spain.

 As a woman, you are also more likely to die giving birth in the U.S. than in
Turkey
Brunei
Latvia
Oman
Bahrain
South Korea
Slovenia
 Puerto Rico
Luxembourg
Montenegro
Belarus
Croatia
New Zealand
Lithuania
Hungary
Bulgaria
Lithuania
Canada
Estonia
United Kingdom
Switzerland
United Arab Emirates
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Kiribati
Macedonia
Netherlands
Singapore
Serbia
Malta
Australia
France
Czech Republic
Finland
Israel
Norway
Portugal
Poland
Slovakia
Japan
Italy
Iceland
Denmark
Austria
Belgium
Sweden
…and Ireland 

Get the full list at http://www.indexmundi.com/g/r.aspx?v=2223

Friday, March 30, 2012

Deadly Delivery: The Maternal Healthcare Crisis in the U.S., a one year update

Deadly Delivery: The Maternal Health Care Crisis in the USA

 

One Year Update

On March 12, 2010, Amnesty International issued a report entitled Deadly Delivery: The Maternal Health Care Crisis in the USA, which documented that although the United States spends more on health care than any other country, it ranked 41st (at the time of publication) in terms of maternal death. As the report demonstrated, this is not just a matter of public health, but a human rights issue. Over half of these deaths are preventable, and the report clearly demonstrated many barriers women face in accessing high quality maternal care.


2010 has been a watershed year for maternal health issues, both globally and in the US. In 2010, new studies and data were released and new legislation and initiatives developed that promise to improve maternal health. Throughout 2010, Amnesty International has been campaigning to end preventable maternal deaths in the US and around the globe. Despite some progress, more work remains to be done in order to ensure that the work of the last year will have a lasting impact. This update will examine the developments and new data on maternal health in the United States, address the expected impact on maternal health and health care of some key provisions in health care reform, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which passed on 23 March 2010, and cover some of the progress and successes that have been accomplished during the last year. All data and developments cited in this update have been released in 2010 or 2011, except where indicated.

Sunday, March 25, 2012

What kills women?

 Why are women in the U.S. dying in childbirth? 5 relatively simple causes account for 75% of deaths:

Embolism 20%
A blood clot that blocks an essential blood vessel, for example in the lungs

Hemorrhage 17%
Severe blood loss

Pre-eclampsia and eclampsia 16%
Disorders associated with excessively high blood pressure

Infection 13%

Cardiomyopathy 8%
Heart muscle disease

Monday, March 19, 2012

Ina May Gaskin speaks on Demoracy Now!

Democracy Now!'s fantastic interview with pioneer-midwife Ina May Gaskin in Ina May Gaskin: on Rising U.S. Maternal Mortality Rate, Midwifery and Home Births

 Check out the video here:
http://www.democracynow.org/2012/3/19/ina_may_gaskin_on_rising_us

or read the transcript, also from Democracy Now!'s website:


AMY GOODMAN: We turn now to the latest in the contraceptive controversy that is growing in states around the country. In Arizona, a bill nearing passage in the legislature would allow any employer to opt out of providing contraceptive insurance coverage. Women wishing to get reimbursed could be required to prove that they are taking birth control for a medical reason rather than to prevent pregnancy. In Georgia, the state senate has voted to ban abortion coverage under the state employees’ healthcare plan and prevent employees of private religious institutions from demanding contraceptive coverage under their insurance. The New Hampshire State House has passed a similar measure. And in Utah, lawmakers have passed legislation that would make their state the first to ban public schools from teaching contraception as a way to prevent pregnancy or sexually transmitted disease.
Meanwhile, the industry website radio-info.com reports there is a new list of 31 advertisers who have, quote, "requested [that] their commercials not be scheduled in any Rush Limbaugh programs." This new list adds to 98 other advertisers who pulled their ads from Rush Limbaugh’s radio show following his use of the terms "slut" and "prostitute" to describe a Georgetown University law student who had advocated for coverage of birth control. At least two stations have completely dropped the Rush Limbaugh program.
Well, as the contraceptive controversy continues, we want to look at another issue involving women’s control over their own bodies and reproductive well-being: the choice of safe, affordable, comfortable birthing options. We are joined right now by Ina May Gaskin, a pioneering midwife, the founder and director of the Farm Midwifery Center in Tennessee. Last year, she won a Right Livelihood Award, quote, "for her whole-life’s work teaching and advocating safe, woman-centered childbirth methods that best promote the physical and mental health of mother and child." She is the author of Ina May’s Guide to Childbirth and, most recently, Birth Matters: A Midwife’s Manifesta. She is also the founder of the Safe Motherhood Quilt Project, which seeks to draw public attention to the high maternal mortality rate in the United States.
Ina May Gaskin, welcome, up from Tennessee here in New York, to Democracy Now! It’s great to have you with us.
INA MAY GASKIN: Thank you, Amy. It’s great to be here.
AMY GOODMAN: You have brought in a quilt. This is a quilt of young women. It’s sort of like the AIDS quilt?
INA MAY GASKIN: Very much. It was inspired by that, because I knew I had a very difficult story to tell that was going to make people sad and, you know, at the risk of feeling sort of hopeless about it. But we don’t count maternal death. We’ve let so many maternal deaths go invisible in these United States. And at the same—I got my information from the Centers for Disease Control itself. And sort of like I.F. Stone digging out of curiosity, I found this really shocking fact that maybe as much as more than half to two-thirds of the maternal deaths that take place aren’t reported to the CDC. You know, that’s very shocking, because, you know, in most industrialized countries, there’s a huge effort to identify every single maternal death, so that you can say, "OK, how do we reduce it next year?"
AMY GOODMAN: How does the rate of maternal mortality in this country compare to other industrialized countries?
INA MAY GASKIN: Depending on whether you’re looking at World Health Organization data or The Lancet's recent study that was funded by the Gates Foundation, we are 40th or 50th, OK? Now, if you add in the underreporting factor, we have no way of knowing how much farther down list we go, but we're following—you know, we’re behind Czech Republic, we’re behind Poland, we’re behind Bosnia-Herzegovina, we’re behind Slovakia, we’re—the list goes on.
AMY GOODMAN: How? How is that possible?
INA MAY GASKIN: Because we don’t give feedback. We don’t have feedback to our obstetricians, to our hospitals or maternity wards, to find out what we’re doing wrong and why the United States is one of four countries in the world where the maternal death rate is going up, not down.
AMY GOODMAN: What do you make of the whole contraceptive controversy? I mean, you’re a midwife. You’re all about giving birth.
INA MAY GASKIN: Yeah.
AMY GOODMAN: But that’s in a larger context of reproductive rights.
INA MAY GASKIN: That’s right. Well, it’s a human rights issue, as, you know, we’re hearing so clearly brought out, you know, by this furor over what Sandra Fluke had to say. Bless her heart and her bravery in speaking up so well. So, it’s quite clear there that, you know, to women across the country, we need choice. What we’re finding out we don’t have is choice in—when the pregnancy continues. Now what? Where you have the baby, it’s not just a matter of getting the baby out of the woman, it’s how we do it. And so, as our C-section rate goes up, up, up—when I began as a midwife, it was under 5 percent. Now—and then, in only a decade, it had quadrupled. And now we’re, in many hospitals, over 50 percent. And that’s going to mean that you—you’ve lost the benefits now of the C-section, and you’re starting to have women dying because of C-sections.
AMY GOODMAN: Well, explain that.
INA MAY GASKIN: Well, this is—when you do too much surgery, when you enter the abdominal cavity, you know, you’ve introduced whole new kinds of complications that can take place. You can have women dying from pulmonary embolism, and that can happen hours or during a C-section. It can happen after. It can happen after the woman goes home. It can be days or weeks. And there can be just—boom, because she doesn’t know that a pain in her leg is a sign of danger. You can have scar tissue that grows and can cause a bowel obstruction, causing a death that way. You can have a scalpel slip and cut the uteran artery and bleed to death. You can have the bowel knicked and then have an infection set up that might mean an early death from bowel obstruction.
All of these are represented on this quilt. So it’s become a educational device for me to know what the dangers are. And the fact that California reported a tripling of the maternal death rate between 1996 and 2006 should—and the fact that here in New York, the New York Academy of Medicine reported that the death rate, which according to the Health and Human Services should be no higher than three to four per 100,000 births, for African-American women has reached an astounding 79 per 100,000. Should be three or four. And this crosses income categories in the—
AMY GOODMAN: Ina May Gaskin, where do midwives fit into this story, and what is a midwife?
INA MAY GASKIN: That’s a great question. A midwife is a woman who—this is a profession that’s the most ancient for women, OK? It precedes the other one that’s, you know, reputed to be the oldest profession. It certainly preceded medicine. But about five centuries ago, the medical profession, which was just becoming a profession, actually took the first steps of encroaching on this previously women-held territory and then really absorbed midwifery. And that extreme—it went to the greatest extreme here in the United States, where the whole profession was obliterated a century ago.
And what happens in a society when that happens is you have women and practitioners, meaning doctors, and then our case here, nurses, become more and more afraid of birth, because they may never have seen a normal one, and so what becomes a kind of behavior that gets obliterated and made invisible. So, we have—we went to having huge numbers of forceps births. And when I had my first baby, I was pretty much moved into a channel, because I went to a hospital, as everybody did. Little did I know that two-thirds of women in this United States had forceps deliveries in the mid-’60s.
AMY GOODMAN: Meaning they put forceps—
INA MAY GASKIN: Big metal tongs, they put it inside the woman, and they pull the baby out, rather forcibly. And being, you know, the fact that I had a master’s degree in English, I knew this wasn’t a good idea. And I had another piece of my upbringing, which was Dad was a farmer, and I knew that all these animals could give birth, and no forceps, and this didn’t make sense to me. I thought, how could medicine have gotten so crazy to think that...
So then I was part of the '60s eruption, where suddenly it was like it rained overnight and then all these midwives cropped up. And I was one of them. And I got a little instruction from some kind-hearted obstetrician and general practitioner along the way. And counting from the first birth I ever saw, bringing my friends into it to be my midwives for my next births, we were able to safely achieve a statistic that I think people would find incredible: we didn't need a C-section until we got to almost 200 births. And we didn’t endanger anybody in the process.
So we learned how to do—deal with breech deliveries, with twins. And our doctor, the local general practitioner, who had extended his medical education by taking care of Amish people, learned that home birth wasn’t dangerous and that we were much like the Amish. And he helped us and taught us these skills that are—I never knew would be disappearing. So now, you know, 40 years after I got into this, we’re living in a time where it’s rare for me to meet a U.S. doctor who’s allowed to do breech deliveries or twins. At the same time, I have women on this quilt who died for lack of doctors knowing these skills. And I’m watching this dry up in different countries, because a lot of countries are under the impression that we are the country to imitate in birth, when we are absolutely not the country to imitate when it comes to birth. We should be looking at countries where fewer women die.
AMY GOODMAN: How many midwives are there in the United States? Are midwives covered by insurance? What are the laws?
INA MAY GASKIN: Oh, different in every state. But generally, midwives are marginalized. Fewer than maybe 10,000—10 percent of women are able to have a midwife. And in many of these situations, midwives are working with restrictions placed on them, so that they’re often not able to learn even the traditional skills that are associated with midwifery. So, you have midwives taking care of too many women at a time, for instance, and that’s not the same as having your own midwife, or in our care, where you’re probably going to have two midwives with you, because it makes births sweeter to do it that way.
So, we are having now this—with the evaporating skills, it’s come to the point where we’re even having some women who aren’t pregnant who have undergone C-sections, because—yes, just published my article in Birth Journal about a phenomenon that few people know about, but I learned about early from reading it in the obstetrics book that there’s such a thing as a false pregnancy that can even trick the body into mimicking signs of pregnancy when it’s not. And if you don’t put your hands on the woman and feel well, you can miss the fact that there’s no baby in there. And this can progress to a point where she gets cut open, and we go, "Oh, she wasn’t pregnant." It’s no longer in the obstetrics book.
AMY GOODMAN: We’re talking to Ina May Gaskin. She has a new book out; it is called Birth Matters: A Midwife’s Manifesta. You refer to "we." Can you talk about where you work and live, the farm in Tennessee?
INA MAY GASKIN: Oh, yeah. Well, we’re blessed to live on 1,750 acres of Tennessee woodland. So it’s a forest. We built a whole community there starting in 1971. And—
AMY GOODMAN: How many people live there?
INA MAY GASKIN: Now we’re about maybe 150 people, but when we settled we were around 300. And my husband Stephen became the first recipient of the Right Livelihood Award, you know, for the work we did, because in learning to build that community, we developed skills that were helpful, and so we had a world outreach, you know, organization we called Plenty. And we did work in Guatemala after an earthquake, and we did work in Lesotho and with Native Americans. And that’s ongoing. So, we lived there. We were vegetarian, had our babies at home, ran a free ambulance service here in the Bronx starting in the late '70s. And so, we're just all over the place doing these sort of different things, and the community is 40 years old now.
AMY GOODMAN: And on the issue of insurance covering midwifery?
INA MAY GASKIN: OK. Insurance has incredible power now, power that it didn’t have 70 years ago. It’s the reason that doctors aren’t learning to do breech deliveries anymore. It’s the reason that midwives are—it’s one of the huge reasons that we have very few midwives in this country. We need 120,000 more easily.
AMY GOODMAN: We have 20 seconds.
INA MAY GASKIN: And so, you don’t have—midwives are at the bottom of the pile, basically, on getting coverage, and especially if we work at home. We’re—we’ve become the scapegoat for all of this distraction, you know? And so, we need payment. We need a lot more midwives. And we also need postpartum care, which midwives could be giving.
AMY GOODMAN: We’re going to continue this interview after the show, and we’ll post it on our website at democracynow.org. Ina May Gaskin is our guest. Her book is Birth Matters: A Midwife’s Manifesta. She’ll be speaking at the 92nd Street Y tonight.

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

NativeTech's cornhusk dolls

Cornhusk Dolls


These dolls are based on Penobscot Dolls illustrated by Frank G. Speck in the mid-1900's. You will need the husks from one or two ears of corn for a 6" doll. This should take you about 1 hour to make. Soak cornhusks (that have been thoroughly dried beforehand) for 10 minutes in warm water.

1. Cut cob, remove husks and save 'hair. Dry everything in the sun for 1-3 days.
2. Soak 10 minutes before using husks. Cut thin ends off.
3. Bundle thin end of 6 leaves around 'hair', slick side of leaves inward. Tie tightly.

4a. Peal leaves around to form head. Hair should sprout up in the middle.
4b. Tie neck area tightly.
5. Braid 3 strips of a leaf into a 6 inch piece for the arms.

6. Braid 2 more lengths in the same way to use later for the 2 legs.
7. Put arms under neck. Insert rolled leaf to fill out and form body. Tie waist area.
8. Insert legs and secure by tying 2 leaves front to back, then trim excess below waist.

9. Wrap and tie one or two strips around top of leg to form hips.
 

NativeTech has a wonderful illustrated version of these instructions.

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

How to Make a Yarn Doll: 9 steps (with pictures) - wikiHow

Yarn dolls are one of the simplest pleasures as a child--they take just a few minutes to make, but you can personalize them in all sorts of ways--giving them bow, making them skirts and headbands and aprons. Changing the color of their hair, their eyes. So, if you've ever wondered how to make a yarn doll, wiwkiHow has a comprehensive article on how it's done.
The only limit is your imagination!

Sunday, February 26, 2012

How to Make A Sock Doll

WikiHow has a fantastic article (here: http://www.wikihow.com/Make-a-Sock-Doll) on how to make a sock doll that's definitely worth sharing! Here's the gist:



Steps

  1. Stuff an ankle sock and stitch up the hem. You could also use a regular sock and just cut off the top. The toe becomes the head, the heel the rear end.
    Stuffing the Sock
    Stuffing the Sock
    Sew the opening closed.
    Sew the opening closed.
  2. Cut off the toe of the second sock and turn inside out.
    Inside out foot and toe section which will become the legs.
    Inside out foot and toe section which will become the legs.
  3. Mark the vertical center line to designate legs (with slightly rounded "toes" as shown).
    Drawing the legs.
    Drawing the legs.
  4. Sew approximately a quarter inch from the center line on each side. Go up one side and down the other, rounding the toes. Leave about 1 inch (2.5 cm) towards the top.
    Sewing around the vertical line.  Take care NOT to go ALL the way up to the opening with your stitching.
    Sewing around the vertical line. Take care NOT to go ALL the way up to the opening with your stitching.
  5. Turn this right side out, stuff and stitch the top closed. These are your doll's legs.
    Legs before stuffing.
    Legs before stuffing.
  6. Sew together the hems (closed openings) of the two socks. As you sew, make sure that the legs and the rear end are at natural angles.
    Sewing legs to body
    Sewing legs to body
    Legs and body from the front after sewing.
    Legs and body from the front after sewing.
  7. Make the arms from the remaining sock.

    • Cutting the sock to get the arm pieces.
      Cutting the sock to get the arm pieces.
      Cut off the heel and toe.
    • Turn, draw a center line and round the "ends" of the arms.
      Turn, draw a center line and round the "ends" of the arms.
      Turn inside out, draw the center line.
    • Sew a quarter inch from the center line.
      Sew a quarter inch from the center line.
      Sew a quarter inch from the center line.
    • Cut the two arms apart.
      Cut the two arms apart.
      Cut apart as shown.
  8. Turn the arms right side out, and then stuff and stitch them to the body.
    Stuff the arms and sew them to the body on either side.
    Stuff the arms and sew them to the body on either side.
  9. With a sturdy thread, sew 1/4 inch stitches around the neck and cinch them slightly to form the head.
    • You can also tie a ribbon (the doll's scarf) around to make the neck and give the doll a unique style.
  10. Use buttons, beads, googly eyes, yarn and markers to make the doll's face.
    A sample face.
    A sample face.
  11. Add yarn hair.

    • Wrap 30 or so strands of yarn around something sturdy that is approximately a foot wide.
      Wrapping yarn around a sturdy object.
      Wrapping yarn around a sturdy object.
    • Place a strip of felt under the yarn, perpendicular to the wrap direction.
      Place strip of felt under yarn.
      Place strip of felt under yarn.
    • Hand baste the yarn strands to the felt strip.
      Baste the yarn to the felt.
      Baste the yarn to the felt.
    • Turn the object over and cut the yarn in the center of the side opposite the basted felt strip.
      Cut opposite the felt.
      Cut opposite the felt.
    • Machine sew the yarn strands to the felt strip.
      Machine sew the yarn strands to the felt strip.
      Machine sew the yarn strands to the felt strip.
    • Trim the felt strip ends.
    • Center the felt strip on the doll's head and sew it on.
      Centering the hair on the head.
      Centering the hair on the head.
      Sewing the hair to the head along the line of felt.
      Sewing the hair to the head along the line of felt.
    • You may leave the hair smooth or braid it, as you prefer.
      Smooth/straight hair.
      Smooth/straight hair.
  12. Cut scraps of cloth to make clothes. Sew these on to the doll. Or, you could make the clothes so that they can be taken on and off easily.
  13. Add whatever extra twists you like and your sock doll is done!